patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

LETTER: Affordable Care Act Will Strengthen Medicare

Repealing Medicare would threaten essential care for thousands of New Hampshire residents.

 

To the Editor:

I admire Jennifer Horn’s concern for her parents and the future of Medicare.  Unfortunately, I believe she misunderstands and therefore misconstrues both Gov. Romney’s and President Obama’s proposals to address this critical program.  The truth is that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) strengthens Medicare, not weakens it.

First, the ACA does not reduce Medicare benefits. The $716 billion Horn and Romney refer to are not cuts but reductions in the rate of growth of Medicare spending. The bulk of these savings come from eliminating excess payments to insurance companies; cutting fraud and abuse; and reducing the rate of growth in reimbursements to hospitals, equipment manufacturers, and other providers, though not physicians.

Second, the ACA strengthens Medicare. It extends the life of the Medicare Part A Trust Fund from 2016 to 2024, which is why the AARP supported Obamacare. It also begins closing the notorious prescription drug doughnut hole, saving 13,000 New Hampshire residents an average of $620 each, and it introduces free preventive care.

Third, Paul Ryan's budget, which the House enacted earlier this year and Charlie Bass and Frank Guinta supported, also includes the $716 billion in reductions in future Medicare spending.

Fourth, by pledging to "restore" the $716 billion in savings, Romney will move the date of exhaustion of the trust fund back to 2016, reopen the doughnut hole and remove the other benefits introduced by the ACA.  This will be a disaster for older adults.  Gov. Romney’s supporters should ask him what he will do when the trust fund runs out in 2016.  One Romney advisor has suggested Romney might begin increasing the age of eligibility for Medicare. Clearly, this all makes a mockery of the pledge by Romney and Ryan that their Medicare proposals will not affect individuals over age 55. 

Currently, 221,000 New Hampshire residents rely on Medicare.  By repealing the Affordable Care Act, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan would threaten the essential coverage Medicare provides. They would re-open the Medicare prescription drug “doughnut hole” leaving New Hampshire seniors paying thousands of dollars for the prescriptions they need. And they would increase seniors’ health care costs by repealing seniors’ access to preventive care with no out of pocket cost.

The bottom line is that President Obama’s $716 billion in Medicare savings won’t cut benefits, and it extends the life of the Part A Trust Fund by eight years, which is why Representative Ryan included these savings in his budget bill.  If Jennifer Horn is concerned about the future of Medicare, she should support the President’s position.

Stephen Gorin
Canterbury

About this column: Letters to the editor do not reflect the opinion of this publication, but rather the opinion of the person who submitted the letter. We reserve the right to withhold letters that are libelous, defamatory, or do not meet Patch's terms of use. Letters may be submitted for consideration to carolyn.dube@patch.com. Related Topics: Jennifer Horn, Letter to the Editor, Medicare, and Opinion

Ravadan Patel

11:12 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Reductions in the rate of growth are always cuts in Washington speak

Always

If I reduce the rate of growth of anything over time, then I've CUT the expense

Try again loser

Reply

Gary A. Gahan

7:01 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

Absolutely correct. How does the government think/feel that it can cut the growth in spending at all? The only way that this could be accomplished by anyone if at all would be to create disinflation at hyper speeds. Hospitals will be going out of business if they can not survive, companies will leave the health care business, research on drugs and new surgeries will stop, etc etc. Doesn't anyone out there "get it".....the free market system works best when left ALONE. Health care needs to become completely transparent and to be treated just like auto and home owners insurance neither of which cover "preventative" issues like oil changes, etc.
People need to know what it costs from each provider, competition within the provider network needs to come about, and people need to be able to purchase their very own tailor made health insurance specific to their needs and wishes.

Reply

Scott Morales

8:22 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

Actually, the bottom line is the bottom line, and $16T of debt is the bottom line. The estimated cost of your leader's act is $2.6T (http://www.npr.org/2012/07/12/156659733/weekly-standard-obamacare-cost-estimates-rise). Say goodbye to Medicare, goodbye to Social Security, goodbye to ObamaCare (I can't use the Orwellian title of affordable care act, it's simply too dishonest) and goodbye to everything else. We can't afford it. You lefties got to spend to your hearts content and enrich your cronies, well, now we have to pay. And when I say we, I mean me, you, my children, your children, our children's children etc. Thanks.

Reply

Leave a comment