POLL: Will Fight for NHGOP Chair Split Party?
Jennifer Horn is being challenged by Andrew Hemingway for the post. The election is scheduled for Jan. 26.
Throughout the 2012 presidential election, Liberty-minded Republicans in New Hampshire repeatedly expressed their displeasure with Mitt Romney.
Even though Romney easily won the New Hampshire primary, many Tea Party members here felt snubbed by the former Massachusetts governor and found it difficult to back him.
Now, some Liberty-leaning Republicans are opposing Romney supporter Jennifer Horn's bid to become the next chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party.
Even though Horn already has the backing of GOP heavyweights like U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte and outgoing Congressmen Frank Guinta and Charles Bass, some Republicans – including former state party Chairman Jack Kimball – have criticized the selection process, urging "Liberty loving Republicans" to reject Horn as chairman.
Earlier this week, former Newt Gingrich New Hampshire director Andrew Hemingway officially announced that he will challenge Horn for the position of NHGOP chairman. It's somewhat reminiscent of 2010, when Kimball rode the Tea Party wave to knock off Juliana Bergeron for the post before being forced to resign a year later.
What do you think? Is the competition good for the party? Or could it divide New Hampshire Republicans even further? Vote in our poll below, and leave a comment with your thoughts.
Mark Simpson
2:56 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Will this leave ms. Horn with less time to ponticate? If so, I am in favor of this move!
ForThePeople
4:01 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Isn't that why she is running for this, Mark? It's a bigger podium.
Bill Smith
3:50 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Can it get any more divided?
bob
4:07 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
ha ha ha! its gets funnier every day!
No Longer interested
5:31 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Competition is usually good. There are sometimes good things that come out of political battles.
Sometimes the winner, after a close fight, will better respect the opposition's point of veiw, the way in which that person competed, and even adopt or collaborate to unify the rank and file.
Sometimes, though, unfortunately, some who squeek by think that God has made them all powerful and it further emboldens them to kick their competitors to the curb.
So a good fight can bring out the best, or the worst in people.
It puts people to the test.
It's up to the combatants to make it what ever it turns out to be.
Brian
5:44 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
I sincerely hope it splits the party. What NH has experienced during the last few years of Republican House "leadership" should never happen again.
No Longer interested
5:48 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
I didn't vote, because I'm just not sure.
Kevin Murphy
7:28 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
This is a no brainer. Horn has been wrong and lost at everything else she's done.
Jan Schmidt
8:54 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Perhaps there should be a third choice? But one that brings the party back to its roots
political
9:35 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Horn's articles and beliefs are so far out that she should not be the NHGOP leader. It's a no brainer. I would like to see less of her articles in Patch as well.
Kevin Murphy
10:07 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012
I agree. She's a Republican Tokyo Rose.
Jan Schmidt
7:57 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Kevin! That's perfect!
Charles Hatch
9:01 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Republicans are already a defeated and divided political party on the wrong side
of history and should be on the Endangered species list. Only an Independant
would pose a threat to Democrats and that is an unlikely Scenario given their tunnel vision.
Joe
7:13 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
@Charles Hatch - Democrats. The party of prosperity for none, mediocrity for all. Let's create an economy where we all HAVE TO shop at Walmart!
Keep China prosperous!
Atlant Schmidt
7:23 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Joe, I wasn't aware that the Walton family (worth a combined total of $102.7 billion as of 2012) were Democrats or supported Democratic causes.
Bruce Van Derven
9:23 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
When it comes to Chairing NH's GOP, Andrew Hemingway isn't just the usual "wanna' be".........he is a "wanna' DO". While Mrs. Horn will likely be going on about "re-branding" the Republican Party, and beginning a lengthy process of examination about where things went wrong in 2012 (and 2008), Hemingway knows that there's little time for the party to engage in navel exploration~what the NH GOP needs is a leader who will figure out how to bring together voters of both parties, and independents, who want to see something get done for a change. He will accomplish this task without compromising the GOP's core values, recognizing that NH voters of all stripes favor a limited government that does the things its intended to do. We don't need the current party "leadership"...the incumbents who blew it...to figure out how to better "comminicate". We need someone to reassert the GOP's standing as unifying Americans who want progress, seen in "nuts and bolts" and not just modified rhetoric. Hemingway is the one best suited to do this ~ period.
Bill Walker
9:59 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
The GOP just blew a 3-1 lead in the NH House in an election against a President with the worst economic record since Hoover. We need someone who can reach out with the Republican message of economic growth and personal freedom to ALL of the families in NH, not just five.
Atlant Schmidt
7:27 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
> We need someone who can reach out with the Republican message of
> economic growth and personal freedom to ALL of the families in NH, not
> just five.
The trouble is that there *AREN'T* any high-ranking Republicans left who subscribe to your proposed message (in New Hampshire or nationally). It's all greed all the time now.
And people are finally starting to see this; that's why the Democrats won such an overwhelming victory in 2012! The Republicans are devolving into a rump party of the racist South and the less-densely-populated countryside.
Seamus Carty
7:53 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
"that's why the Democrats won such an overwhelming victory in 2012!"
Gee, a lot has changed in just two years since the Republican's overwhelming victory in 2010 when they won the state house and state senate. The Democrats will have to show progress or the pendulum will swing the other way in 2014....
Atlant Schmidt
8:10 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Seamus:
2010 was a national reaction to the fact that the Republicans successfully blocked everything the national Democrats (including President Obama) tried to do. Seeing no progress, the vote went against the Democrats.
Since that time, it has become obvious that the reason nothing happened is that Republicans, at all levels, are standing four-square in the way of all progress, much as you and your friends do here on Patch. But in 2012, the voters weren't fooled.
And the demographics of both the state and the nation are shifting to favor the Democrats. This is occurring as the Republicans marginalize themselves into a racist, misogynist, anti-gay, anti-AMERICAN regional rump party.
Republicans are setting themselves up for a string of losses in the upcoming years and even the vast gerrymandering they did in 2010 won't help that.
LJoel Hackbart
11:14 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
" The GOP just blew a 3-1 lead in the NH House in an election against a President with the worst economic record since Hoover" Poor Bill,
You have your timeline confused.. Bush left office four years ago.
Charles Hatch
10:48 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Governor John Lynch elected 4 times served 8 years.
The longest consecutive Governor in the history of
New Hampshire, Governor Lynch loved people and the
people of New Hampshire loved Governor John Lynch.
His non strident tone and governing style reaching across
the Partisan party lines to solve problems and produce
results working with Republicans and Democrats.
The people of New Hampshire have had 8 years of a
governor that walked with them during Natural disasters
And securing federal funds, FEMA Coordinating.
" Voters really don't care how much you know
until they know how much you care ".
This would be a hard lesson for Republicans to grasp and impletment in to Sincerity and political Perception.
The harsh political fact is that Democrats seem to care more about people the Republicans do.
john grady
10:56 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Well said!
As for the GOP Chair position, I am content to sit back and enjoy seeing the members of the other party bicker among themselves.
Bull Moose
12:06 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Divided? In to what? The insanity wing and the ignorance wing?
Proud Conservative
2:58 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
No room there - those wings are filled.................with Democrats.
Lisa Whittemore
12:25 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
NH once enjoyed a longstanding tradition of socially-responsible, fiscally-conservative Republican leadership. It provided New Hampshire with reasonable growth, stable business environment and hope for all our families. There was respect for individuals involved in the process, respect for the work being done, and respect for the voters who sent us there to do the work. Since the 1980's we have seen many able moderates in the party singled out and variously harrassed, ejected and hurled from positions of party leadership. I worked with some of those moderates many years ago, and I deeply regret the transition of a granite-state Republican party founded in the values of common sense and public service to one that has much closer ties to the imported values of winner-take-all, money-talks politics. I know moderates in the party now who are capable, willing and committed to offer leadership that could serve all NH and its people. I would love to see the Republicans in our state return to the heartland values of respect for the individual and seeking the common good for NH families. And get the big money out of the process.
No Longer interested
12:31 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Well said.
Mike Healey
1:46 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Today's Democrat is yesterday's "socially-responsible, fiscally-conservative Republican"
Dennis hopper
1:22 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Have some, draft ken erling to lead GOP.
Lisa Whittemore
2:33 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Further note: My primary objection to the selection of Sarah Palin never was about her actual credentials -- it was the thought of how many highly-qualified and skilled Republican women they had to climb over to find her and put her front and center of the national party. As a NH Democrat, I could name four Republican women in my state who should have been chosen before anyone boarded Alaska Air. Add to that the national figures who had gained standing in the eyes of the American people, and you begin to have a concept of what a bad idea that was.
Atlant Schmidt
7:30 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Here in New Hampshire, I'd like to specifically cite Liz Hager; it was my pleasure to know here and support her while she was in elective office.
Here in Nashua, our own Jane O'Hearn, my former neighbor, was a good example of the old (sensible, pragmatic) school of Republican thought.
ForThePeople
10:17 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Be careful what you wish for, Atlant. In one sense, I would like to see a more moderate Republican Party, but in another, their platform needs to be rewritten first before we start tricking people into believing they are moderate at all. Rephrased, what happens if you put your candidate in the middle of an extremist party? The mouthpiece might sound good, but there's no way crazy doesn't infiltrate legislation.
Stephen LaBranche
7:08 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Good luck Andrew!
sunstamp
10:43 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
The "Establishment" is the ones that split the party. When Jack Kimball won the last election, they threw a hissy fit and held back money and did everything in their power to undermine him. So if Jennifer Horn loses, expect more of the same.
Tom Linehan
7:24 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
If I am fortunate enough to be elected as a voting delegate, I would at this point vote for Andrew Hemingway. He has bridged many of the factions within the Republican Party. He has been involved in campaigns for main stream candidates (e.g. Gingrich) and is a pioneer in social media in political campaigns. The future of the Republican Party with young people depends on how well we employ social media to express our values in media young people use. Andrew Hemingway is one person who has done that successfully. Unless a better candidate emerges, Andrew Hemingway if I am elected, would get my vote.
Steve From NH
7:15 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
I don't think it's the delivery of the message that's the problem, I think it's the message itself.
wm as it is.
9:22 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
At least the republican know what's dividing them. .
I don't think we should be so concerned with what's dividing the parties, but what is dividing this nation. maybe it's time for two smaller government's.
Love NH
4:28 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
How would that work?
Daniel Dwyer
9:48 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
It's great when people flap their gums and critize the only two people who have the guts to take on the thankless Payless job in the first place.
Leah
4:22 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
I heard them both speak at the Hillsborough County Caucus. Andrew was fresh, dynamic, knowledgable and experienced. He has my vote in January.
ObserverNH
4:25 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
At least we can be sure that neither of them will be caught cruising the little 'boy' sex shops in Amsterdam! LOL...
Elizabeth
7:51 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
I'm personally hoping we get to a point where collectively, we liberty lovers are represented by people who really do believe that all humans are created equal and have a least a middle school comprehension of the female anatomy. I'm sick and embarrassed defending my position as a Republican. Can't we get back to what we do best as NH Republicans; low taxes, fiscal discipline and more of a libertarian "live and let live" perspective on social issues?
Steve From NH
11:25 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
-> "We liberty lovers"
Everyone loves liberty, even Democrats and Independents. Getting kinda sick and tired of Free-staters, Tea Partiers, and Republicans in general claiming to have cornered the market on appreciation for "Liberty". Especially those who proclaim to love liberty, unless you disagree with them, or as you allude to - exert control over your own "lady parts". Ironically those are the ones who seem to yell the loudest and sign letters "Yours In Liberty" or similar drivel.
ForThePeople
11:46 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Low taxes, fiscal discipline, and a "live and let live" perspective also describes many Democrats. The key difference between your Republicans and Democrats is that you don't have that overbearing religious craziness telling people how to live their lives. This means that abortion, birth control, the morning after pill, so on and so forth remain legal. Also, the bigotry gets toned down. I'm sure you heard about losing votes with minorities; that's no accident.
You might want to consider looking at the parties for what they are today, and seeing if that fits your perspective or not.
steve forte
3:56 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Are you kidding me? The democratic party has been taken over by spend and tax liberals. I have voted for many in the past and even then I wouldn't consider them to have " fiscal disipline"